This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cawthorne, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Identity, values and method

taking interview research seriously in political economy

University of Sydney, pamelac{at}econ.usyd.edu.au

Qualitative research tends to be regarded as non-rigorous, subjectively biased and, in general, unscientific. This paper is a restatement of the merits of this type of research allied to a repudiation of the arguments of its various critics - particularly the positivist tradition in economics. Primarily, it takes issue with the supposed greater objectivity attained through quantitative and positivistic research methods. But it is equally critical of a too narrow understanding of language and text and of (some types of) worries about disempowered informants. Instead, it is argued that seeking to understand, interpret and report honestly the things people say and the things people do in all their ‘messy complexity’ enables deep and rich knowledge claims to be made. However, for the full richness of such claims to emerge, they must be mediated reflexively and self-consciously through the purposes - and associated theoretical frameworks - researchers bring to their work. An understanding of the Wittgensteinian approach to language, if allied with a Marxian framework for the broader understanding of social processes, is argued to provide powerful analytical tools in the practice of qualitative social and economic research.

Key Words: development • fieldwork method • Fiji • garments • India • Marx • positivist economics • Wittgenstein

Qualitative Research, Vol. 1, No. 1, 65-90 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/146879410100100104


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Bradshaw A Politics of Doing Social Research for Fishery Biologists, Managers and Industry Qualitative Research, December 1, 2003; 3(3): 359 - 376. [Abstract] [PDF]