Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Qualitative Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alison, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Stein, K. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Unobtrusive measurement: using police information for forensic research

Laurence J. Alison

University of Liverpool, alison1{at}liverpool.ac.uk

Brent Snook

University of Liverpool

Kristin L. Stein

University of Liverpool

This article explores how unobtrusive research methods popularized by Webb et al. (1966) can be utilized in forensic research. In particular, the value of the approach is considered with special reference to examining investigative processes and criminal behaviour. Webb et al.’s three non-reactive types of unobtrusive measures (physical traces, archival material and simple observation) are discussed in relation to a variety of types of material collected across the course of police enquiries. The breadth and variation of this material is emphasized with special consideration of its utility for research. We illustrate how the limitations and benefits identified by Webb et al. are echoed within the forensic domain and how close attention to the methods of collecting such material developed by researchers may improve the effectiveness of investigations.

Key Words: data collection • forensic science • policing • unobtrusive measurement

Qualitative Research, Vol. 1, No. 2, 241-254 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/146879410100100208
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 European Journal of CriminologyHome page
L. E. Porter and L. J. Alison
Examining Group Rape: A Descriptive Analysis of Offender and Victim Behaviour
European Journal of Criminology, July 1, 2006; 3(3): 357 - 381.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Homicide StudiesHome page
C. G. Salfati and F. Dupont
Canadian Homicide: An Investigation of Crime-Scene Actions
Homicide Studies, May 1, 2006; 10(2): 118 - 139.
[Abstract] [PDF]