This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Howarth, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Using the theory of social representations to explore difference in the research relationship

Nottingham Trent University, caroline.howarth{at}ntu.ac.uk

This article explores how the question of difference can be addressed within the research relationship. The first part of the article analyses the consequences of difference in one particularly compelling research encounter where accusations of racism damaged the research relationship. The author argues that we need to examine the researcher-researched relationship in detail and investigate the recognition of difference that structures this relationship in order to analyse material drawn from research. The second part of the article shows how this may be done within a particular social psychological perspective - that of the theory of social representations. This enables an exploration into the relationship between what is said, who said it and to whom, or, in other words, an analysis of the relationship between representations emerging and identities being played out in the research context. The value of this approach is illustrated by studying an example from the author’s own research. The final part of the article demonstrates that difference in the researcher-researched relationship is not simply a problem of methodology but needs to be analysed as a feature of human relations. The article argues that an understanding of the relationship between social representations and identities illuminates the question of difference in qualitative research and demonstrates the value of difference.

Key Words: difference • racism • researcher identity • social representations

Qualitative Research, Vol. 2, No. 1, 21-33 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/1468794102002001637


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. V. de Gialdino Identity, Poverty Situations and the Epistemology of the Known Subject Sociology, June 1, 2006; 40(3): 473 - 491. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Voelklein and C. Howarth A Review of Controversies about Social Representations Theory: A British Debate Culture Psychology, December 1, 2005; 11(4): 431 - 454. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Howarth, J. Foster, and N. Dorrer Exploring the Potential of the Theory of Social Representations in Community-Based Health Research--and Vice Versa? J Health Psychol, March 1, 2004; 9(2): 229 - 243. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Howarth `So, you're from Brixton?': The struggle for recognition and esteem in a stigmatized community Ethnicities, June 1, 2002; 2(2): 237 - 260. [Abstract] [PDF]