Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Qualitative Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Labaree, R. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The risk of ‘going observationalist’: negotiating the hidden dilemmas of being an insider participant observer

Robert V. Labaree

University of Southern California, labaree{at}usc.edu

Based on a review of the literature and the author’s own experiences, this article develops a framework for understanding the hidden dilemmas of being an insider participant observer. A common assumption made about participant observation is that being an insider offers a distinct advantage in terms of accessing and understanding the culture. However, these advantages are not absolute and the insider must be aware of ethical and methodological dilemmas associated with entering the field, positioning and disclosure, shared relationships and disengagement. The article discusses these dilemmas and identifies issues that need more careful evaluation and analysis within the field of qualitative inquiry. The assumption that insiderness provides the researcher with greater access and deeper understanding is often true, but the degree of achieved insiderness is related to a number of critical factors that are determined by the circumstances of the moment.

Key Words: objectivity • participant observation • research problems • self-efficacy

Qualitative Research, Vol. 2, No. 1, 97-122 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/1468794102002001641
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Qualitative Social WorkHome page
S. S. Al-Makhamreh and G. Lewando-Hundt
Researching `at Home' as an Insider/Outsider: Gender and Culture in an Ethnographic Study of Social Work Practice in an Arab Society
Qualitative Social Work, March 1, 2008; 7(1): 9 - 23.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qualitative ResearchHome page
S. Mertkan-Ozunlu
Reflexive accounts about qualitative interviewing within the context of educational policy in North Cyprus
Qualitative Research, November 1, 2007; 7(4): 447 - 459.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 SexualitiesHome page
T. Sanders
Sexing Up the Subject: Methodological Nuances in Researching the Female Sex Industry
Sexualities, October 1, 2006; 9(4): 449 - 468.
[Abstract] [PDF]