This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Henry, M. G. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

`Where are you Really from?': Representation, Identity and Power in the Fieldwork Experiences of a South Asian Diasporic

University of Bristol, Marsha.Henry{at}bristol.ac.uk

Feminist accounts of fieldwork have often been concerned with issues of representation, both of the researched and the researcher, exposing some of the complications that arise when the researcher must make critical decisions about representing herself to her research participants. These accounts demonstrate that a fieldworker's identity does in fact impact upon the research process and product, challenging notions of researcher objectivity and neutrality. I contribute to feminist debates by complicating the process of representation and the power and problem of naming; identity and its impact upon the research process; and the field as a place of complex power structures, which can produce questions that seem all too familiar. One of the questions raised in relation to representation, identity and the field is one that I have been asked virtually all my life, but which has different meanings in different contexts. My research participants often asked, `where are you really from?' This question in the context of the feminist literature on methodology has enabled me to analyse some of the difficulties and problems I faced in doing fieldwork and to develop a different conceptualization of the research process and research participants. Finally, it has also demonstrated some of the difficulties that our current and limited language of race, ethnicity and nationality pose for first generation South Asian researchers.

Key Words: diasporic • feminist • field • home • identity • insider/outsider • power • representation

Qualitative Research, Vol. 3, No. 2, 229-242 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/14687941030032005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Rice Imagining the Other? Ethical Challenges of Researching and Writing Women's Embodied Lives Feminism Psychology, May 1, 2009; 19(2): 245 - 266. [Abstract] [PDF]

				U. Soni-Sinha Dynamics of the `field': multiple standpoints, narrative and shifting positionality in multisited research Qualitative Research, September 1, 2008; 8(4): 515 - 537. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. D. Palmer Negotiating the indistinct: reflections of a Korean Adopted American working with Korean Born, Korean Americans Qualitative Research, November 1, 2006; 6(4): 473 - 495. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. K. Riessman Exporting ethics: a narrative about narrative research in South India Health (London) , October 1, 2005; 9(4): 473 - 490. [Abstract] [PDF]