This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Michael, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

On Making Data Social: Heterogeneity in Sociological Practice

Goldsmiths College, University of London, UK M.Michael{at}gold.ac.uk

This article is concerned with how we might go about theorizing the roles of nonhumans (technologies, animals, etc.), and their associations with humans, in the production of ‘social data’. Drawing on recent sociological work on heterogeneity, the article explores how nonhumans contribute to the emergence of both the ‘microsocial’ and ‘macrosocial’ as complex patterns of ordering and disordering. These patterns are exemplified with reference to a ‘disastrous interview episode’. With the aid of such concepts as parasite, preposition and co(a)gent, the disastrous interview episode is interpreted in three ways to show how nonhumans must be disciplined in order to allow the emergence of social data; how nonhumans’ ‘misbehaviour’ can be understood in terms of their ‘hybridic’ associations with humans; and how the interaction between hybrids mediates such macro entities as universities and corporations. Finally, in conclusion, some of the broader implications of this analysis for sociological practice are considered.

Key Words: co(a)gent • heterogeneity • parasite • preposition • social data • sociological practice

Qualitative Research, Vol. 4, No. 1, 5-23 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1468794104041105


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Halewood and M. Michael Being a Sociologist and Becoming a Whiteheadian: Toward a Concrescent Methodology Theory Culture Society, July 1, 2008; 25(4): 31 - 56. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Hurdley Focal points: framing material culture and visual data Qualitative Research, August 1, 2007; 7(3): 355 - 374. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Birke, M. Bryld, and N. Lykke Animal Performances: An Exploration of Intersections between Feminist Science Studies and Studies of Human/Animal Relationships Feminist Theory, August 1, 2004; 5(2): 167 - 183. [Abstract] [PDF]