| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
A counter-narrative of a failed interviewUniversity of Otago, Aotearoa, New Zealand, Karen.Nairn{at}stonebow.otago.ac.nz
University of Otago, Aotearoa, New Zealand, jenny.munro{at}stonebow.otago.ac.nz
University of Otago, Aotearoa, New Zealand, anneb.smith{at}stonebow.otago.ac.nz In a broader research project about students perceptions of their rights in New Zealand high schools, the first author conducted an interview with a group of students that was noticeably different from her interviews with groups of students at three other high schools. This article was prompted in the first instance by a sense of this noticeably different interview being a failure because of the limited spoken text elicited. In this article we demonstrate what we can learn from data regarding embodiment, the interview setting, silence, laughter and, in the process, we attempt to practise uncomfortable reflexivities advocated by Pillow (2003). We argue that an apparently failed interview has a great deal to teach us about the theory and practice of qualitative research and the tenuous nature of the production of knowledge. We finish by identifying how our experience of this failed interview informs our current research.
Key Words: embodiment interviewing across difference interview setting laughter silence uncomfortable reflexivities
Qualitative Research, Vol. 5, No. 2,
221-244 (2005) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||
