This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Frosh, S. Articles by Emerson, P. D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Interpretation and over-interpretation: disputing the meaning of texts

Birkbeck College, University of London, s.frosh{at}bbk.ac.uk

Peter D. Emerson

Unthank Family Centre, Norwich, peter.emerson.socs{at}norfolk.gov.uk

In order to address issues concerning the ‘positioning’ of individuals in discourse, appeal has recently been made to psychoanalytic formulations offering plausible interpretations of how and why specific subjects take up the positions they do. This raises many problems concerning the relationship between ‘top-down’ or ‘expert’ interpretive strategies and the ‘bottom-up’ grounded approaches traditionally preferred by qualitative researchers. Along with these methodological issues go epistemological and political questions concerning power and accountability.

The current article stages a dialogue around psychoanalytically and discursively driven interpretive strategies, centring on the analysis of material concerning a teenage boy’s attempt to develop a ‘non-hegemonic’ position with regard to masculinity. A psychoanalytic reading of the boy’s talk is given alongside a discursive analysis used to offer a critique of this approach. It is argued a) that psychoanalytic interpretive strategies require much more grounding than is usually available from conventional interview texts; and b) that a dialogue of psychoanalytic and discursive analytic interpretations serves to raise questions of difference as possibilities for collaboration.

Key Words: critical psychology • discursive analysis • interpretation • psychoanalysis

Qualitative Research, Vol. 5, No. 3, 307-324 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1468794105054457


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Gough A psycho-discursive approach to analysing qualitative interview data, with reference to a father--son relationship Qualitative Research, November 1, 2009; 9(5): 527 - 545. [Abstract] [PDF]