This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Stewart, K. Articles by Williams, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Researching online populations: the use of online focus groups for social research

Cardiff University, Stewartkf{at}cardiff.ac.uk

Matthew Williams

Cardiff University, WilliamsM7{at}cardiff.ac.uk

The survivability of ‘traditional’ methods within computer-mediated settings is dependent upon their capacity to be utilized and adapted to the technology that mediates human interaction online. This article addresses the established focus group method and evaluates its success in online applications, using as examples two quite different research projects. The first, drawn from research into the employment experiences of inflammatory bowel disease sufferers exemplifies the use of asynchronous online focus groups, identifying key practical issues such as online moderation and the analysis of digital data. In contrast the second study, into deviance within online communities, provides an example of how synchronous forms of online focus groups, held within 3D graphical environments, create further challenges for the researcher, highlighting unique ethical considerations of conducting fieldwork in cyberspace. The article draws together the authors’ experiences of applying the method to offer insights into the viability and practicability of online focus groups.

Key Words: analysing digital data • ethics • focus groups • Internet research • online research

Qualitative Research, Vol. 5, No. 4, 395-416 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1468794105056916


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Peek and A. Fothergill Using focus groups: lessons from studying daycare centers, 9/11, and Hurricane Katrina Qualitative Research, February 1, 2009; 9(1): 31 - 59. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Clark `We're Over-Researched Here!': Exploring Accounts of Research Fatigue within Qualitative Research Engagements Sociology, October 1, 2008; 42(5): 953 - 970. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. S. Wall and M. Williams Policing diversity in the digital age: Maintaining order in virtual communities JCriminology and Criminal Justice, November 1, 2007; 7(4): 391 - 415. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Madge Developing a geographers' agenda for online research ethics Progress in Human Geography, October 1, 2007; 31(5): 654 - 674. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Gibson Conducting focus groups with children and young people: strategies for success Journal of Research in Nursing, September 1, 2007; 12(5): 473 - 483. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. E. Fox, M. Morris, and N. Rumsey Doing Synchronous Online Focus Groups With Young People: Methodological Reflections Qual Health Res, April 1, 2007; 17(4): 539 - 547. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Williams Avatar watching: participant observation in graphical online environments Qualitative Research, February 1, 2007; 7(1): 5 - 24. [Abstract] [PDF]