Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Qualitative Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Darbyshire, P.
Right arrow Articles by Schiller, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Multiple methods in qualitative research with children: more insight or just more?

Philip Darbyshire

University of South Australia, & Flinders University, philip.darbyshire{at}adelaide.edu.au

Colin MacDougall

Flinders University, colin.macdougall{at}flinders.edu.au

Wendy Schiller

University of South Australia, wendy.schiller{at}unisa.edu.au

This article explores the research implications of using multi-methods within a broad qualitative approach by drawing on the experience of conducting two childhood obesity-focused qualitative studies of Australian children’s perceptions and experiences of place, space and physical activity. Children described and depicted their physical activities and experiences: in focus group interviews, by mapping their local, social and recreational spaces and by photographing their meaningful places, spaces and activities using a Photovoice approach. The authors describe, reflect on and critique their chosen research approach, discussing the value, utility and pitfalls associated with using multiple methods with children. The article concludes that using multiple methods in researching children’s experiences is a valuable approach that does not merely duplicate data but also offers complementary insights and understandings that may be difficult to access through reliance on a single method of data collection.

Key Words: children • focus group • mapping • multi-method • obesity • participatory • Photovoice • physical activity • qualitative

Qualitative Research, Vol. 5, No. 4, 417-436 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1468794105056921


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChildhoodHome page
I. Coyne, E. Hayes, and P. Gallagher
Research With Hospitalized Children: Ethical, methodological and organizational challenges
Childhood, August 1, 2009; 16(3): 413 - 429.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qualitative ResearchHome page
L. Peek and A. Fothergill
Using focus groups: lessons from studying daycare centers, 9/11, and Hurricane Katrina
Qualitative Research, February 1, 2009; 9(1): 31 - 59.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
E. Colucci
"Focus Groups Can Be Fun": The Use of Activity-Oriented Questions in Focus Group Discussions
Qual Health Res, December 1, 2007; 17(10): 1422 - 1433.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Research in NursingHome page
J. Coad
Using art-based techniques in engaging children and young people in health care consultations and/or research
Journal of Research in Nursing, September 1, 2007; 12(5): 487 - 497.
[Abstract] [PDF]