| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Multiple methods in qualitative research with children: more insight or just more?University of South Australia, & Flinders University, philip.darbyshire{at}adelaide.edu.au
Flinders University, colin.macdougall{at}flinders.edu.au
University of South Australia, wendy.schiller{at}unisa.edu.au This article explores the research implications of using multi-methods within a broad qualitative approach by drawing on the experience of conducting two childhood obesity-focused qualitative studies of Australian childrens perceptions and experiences of place, space and physical activity. Children described and depicted their physical activities and experiences: in focus group interviews, by mapping their local, social and recreational spaces and by photographing their meaningful places, spaces and activities using a Photovoice approach. The authors describe, reflect on and critique their chosen research approach, discussing the value, utility and pitfalls associated with using multiple methods with children. The article concludes that using multiple methods in researching childrens experiences is a valuable approach that does not merely duplicate data but also offers complementary insights and understandings that may be difficult to access through reliance on a single method of data collection.
Key Words: children focus group mapping multi-method obesity participatory Photovoice physical activity qualitative
Qualitative Research, Vol. 5, No. 4,
417-436 (2005) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



