This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Moran-Ellis, J. Articles by Thomas, H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Triangulation and integration: processes, claims and implications

University of Surrey, J.Moran-Ellis{at}surrey.ac.uk

Victoria D. Alexander

University of Surrey, V.Alexander{at}surrey.ac.uk

Ann Cronin

University of Surrey, A.Cronin{at}surrey.ac.uk

Mary Dickinson

University of Surrey, M.Dickinson{at}surrey.ac.uk

Jane Fielding

University of Surrey, J.Fielding{at}surrey.ac.uk

Judith Sleney

University of Surrey, J.Sleney{at}surrey.ac.uk

Hilary Thomas

University of Surrey, H.Thomas{at}surrey.ac.uk

Researchers who advocate the use of multiple methods often write interchangeably about ‘integrating’, ‘combining’ and ‘mixing’ methods, sometimes eliding these descriptors with ‘triangulation’, which itself encompasses several meanings. In this article we argue that such an elision is problematic since it obscures the difference between (a) the processes by which methods (or data) are brought into relationship with each other (combined, integrated, mixed) and (b) the claims made for the epistemological status of the resulting knowledge. Drawing on the literature for examples, we set out different rationales for using more than one method, then we develop a definition of integration of methods as a specific kind of relationship among methods. We also discuss different places in the research process where integration can occur: for instance, data from different sources can be integrated in the analysis stage, or findings from different sources at the point of theorizing.

Key Words: integration • mixed methods • multiple methods • triangulation

Qualitative Research, Vol. 6, No. 1, 45-59 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1468794106058870


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Bazeley Editorial: Integrating Data Analyses in Mixed Methods Research Journal of Mixed Methods Research, July 1, 2009; 3(3): 203 - 207. [PDF]

				M. Sandelowski, C. I. Voils, and G. Knafl On Quantitizing Journal of Mixed Methods Research, July 1, 2009; 3(3): 208 - 222. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. K. Denzin The elephant in the living room: or extending the conversation about the politics of evidence Qualitative Research, April 1, 2009; 9(2): 139 - 160. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Simons, J. Lathlean, and C. Squire Shifting the Focus: Sequential Methods of Analysis With Qualitative Data Qual Health Res, January 1, 2008; 18(1): 120 - 132. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Descartes Rewards and Challenges of Using Ethnography in Family Research Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, September 1, 2007; 36(1): 22 - 39. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Freshwater Integrating mixed-methods research into healthcare Journal of Research in Nursing, May 1, 2006; 11(3): 179 - 181. [PDF]