Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Qualitative Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dicks, B.
Right arrow Articles by Coffey, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Multimodal ethnography

Bella Dicks

Cardiff University, dicksb{at}cf.ac.uk

Bambo Soyinka

Cardiff University, soyinkab{at}cf.ac.uk

Amanda Coffey

Cardiff University, Coffey{at}cardiff.ac.uk

Ethnographers, like other researchers, currently have a broad range of media at their disposal for conducting fieldwork, for aiding analysis and, most challengingly, for representing their completed work. These include digital media such as photographs, video film, audio-recordings, graphics and others besides. Through the computer ‘writing space’, these media can be integrated together, alongside more conventional written interpretation, into hypermedia environments. However, integration poses a number of potential problems, which this article addresses through a discussion of the semiotics of multimedia. In particular, it argues that different media can be seen to ‘afford’ different kinds of meaning. The integration of different media, therefore, has potentially significant implications for ethnography. Rather than seeing these media forms as discrete, we suggest an approach to ethnographic work which sees meaning as emerging from the fusion of differently mediated forms into new, ‘multi-semiotic’ modes. We therefore recognize the need to go beyond the current interest in visual methods, and instead to develop ways of understanding what kinds of meanings are produced in multimodal ethnographic work.

Key Words: hypermedia • multimedia • multimodality • qualitative data analysis • qualitative research methods • representation

Qualitative Research, Vol. 6, No. 1, 77-96 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1468794106058876


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qualitative ResearchHome page
N. J. Ross, E. Renold, S. Holland, and A. Hillman
Moving stories: using mobile methods to explore the everyday lives of young people in public care
Qualitative Research, November 1, 2009; 9(5): 605 - 623.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qualitative ResearchHome page
L. Liebenberg
The visual image as discussion point: increasing validity in boundary crossing research
Qualitative Research, September 1, 2009; 9(4): 441 - 467.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
D. Murthy
Digital Ethnography: An Examination of the Use of New Technologies for Social Research
Sociology, October 1, 2008; 42(5): 837 - 855.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qualitative ResearchHome page
R. Hurdley
Focal points: framing material culture and visual data
Qualitative Research, August 1, 2007; 7(3): 355 - 374.
[Abstract] [PDF]