This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Abell, J. Articles by Stevenson, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Trying similarity, doing difference: the role of interviewer self-disclosure in interview talk with young people

Lancaster University

Abigail Locke

Loughborough University

Susan Condor

Stephen Gibson

Lancaster University

Clifford Stevenson

Queens University of Belfast

Advocates of semi-structured interview techniques have often argued that rapport may be built, and power inequalities between interviewer and respondent counteracted, by strategic self-disclosure on the part of the interviewer. Strategies that use self-disclosure to construct similarity between interviewer and respondent rely on the presumption that the respondent will in fact interpret the interviewer's behaviour in this way. In this article we examine the role of interviewer self-disclosure using data drawn from three projects involving interviews with young people. We consider how an interviewer's attempts to ‘do similarity’ may be interpreted variously as displays of similarity or, ironically, as indicators of difference by the participant, and map the implications that this may have for subsequent interview dialogue. A particular object of concern relates to the ways in which self-disclosing acts may function in the negotiation of category entitlement within interview interactions.

Key Words: category entitlement • identity • interaction • interviews • narrative • self-disclosure

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?