Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Qualitative Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watts, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

‘The outsider within’: dilemmas of qualitative feminist research within a culture of resistance

Jacqueline Watts

The Open University

Feminist research practice is firmly established within the academy and is concerned to develop ways of understanding reality that place women at their centre. However, researching women who do not identify with feminist aims presents feminist researchers with particular challenges in relation to appropriate method and ethical practice. This article discusses these challenges focusing on the issues of ‘gatekeeper’ access, informed consent and the impact that the insider researcher role has on ‘truth telling’. Ideas offered are a critical reflection on qualitative research undertaken into the career experiences of women civil engineers in the UK. The extent to which the inside knowledge of the researcher gives rise to shared understandings and a ‘common’ language, and the ways this creates empathy across a ‘political’ and theoretical divide are discussed. An ethics of care model of feminist research practice that suggests that the line between empathy and exploitation is, in reality, a fine one, is considered. This article argues that researcher integrity is complex and dynamic; it functions along a continuum of practical constraint that involves mutuality, negotiation and re-negotiation of boundaries with participants.

Key Words: ethical research • feminist • qualitative method • resistance

Qualitative Research, Vol. 6, No. 3, 385-402 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1468794106065009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
J. H. Watts
Leaders of men: women 'managing' in construction
Work Employment Society, September 1, 2009; 23(3): 512 - 530.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
J. H. Watts
Porn, pride and pessimism: experiences of women working in professional construction roles
Work Employment Society, June 1, 2007; 21(2): 299 - 316.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Feminism PsychologyHome page
J. Watts
IV. Can't Take a Joke? Humour as Resistance, Refuge and Exclusion in a Highly Gendered Workplace
Feminism Psychology, May 1, 2007; 17(2): 259 - 266.
[PDF]