Qualitative Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, E. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Qualitative Research, Vol. 6, No. 4, 497-513 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1468794106068019

Abduction as the type of inference that characterizes the development of a grounded theory

Rudy Richardson

Netherlands Defense Academy, The Netherlands

Eric Hans Kramer

Netherlands Defense Academy, The Netherlands

In this article, abduction is introduced in relation to theorizing in grounded theory. Theoretical insights are inevitable cornerstones of the development of a grounded theory and abduction is worked out as a type of inference that characterizes this development. How abduction could be used in grounded theorizing is shown in a grounded theory research on ‘organizing doubt’, i.e. the way Dutch army units are formed with self-organizing capabilities that can be deployed during crisis operations. The authors show that two concepts from organizational theory that are central in this grounded theory’s analytical framework - i.e. ‘dynamic complexity’ and ‘self-organization’ - are developed and embedded in a substantive theory on ‘organizing doubt’ by abductive reasoning.

Key Words: abduction • grounded theory • organizational design • qualitative research • military organizations

References

  • Bateson, G. (2002) Mind and Nature. A Necessary Unit. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press .
  • Billig, M. (1996) Arguing and Thinking. A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology (2nd Edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
  • Charmaz, K. (2000) ‘Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods’, in N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd Edition), pp. 509-536. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
  • Charmaz, K. and Mitchell, R. G. (2001) ‘Grounded Theory in Ethnography’, in P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont and J. Lofland (eds) Handbook of Ethnography, pp. 160-174. London: Sage .
  • Clarke, A. E. (2005) Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory at the Postmodern Turn. London: Sage .
  • Coffey, A. and Atkinson, P. (1996) Making Sense of Qualitative Data. Complementary Research Strategies. London: Sage .
  • Cunningham, D. J. (1998) ‘Cognition as a Semiosis: The Role of Inference’ , Theory and Psychology 8(6): 827-840 .
  • De Sitter, U. (2000) Synergetisch Produceren. Assen: Van Gorcum .
  • Emery, F. and Emery, M. (1997) ‘Towards a Logic of Hypotheses. Everyone Does Research’ , Concepts and Transformation 2(2): 119-144 .
  • Glaser, B. (1978) Theoretical Sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press .
  • Glaser, B. (1992) Emergence vs Forcing: Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press .
  • Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
  • Gustavsen, B. (1996) ‘Is Theory Useful?’ , Concepts and Transformation 1(1): 63-77 .
  • Kelle, U. (1995) ‘Theories as Heuristic Tools in Qualitative Research’, in I. Maso, P. A. Atkinson, S. Delamont and J. C. Verhoeven (eds) Openness in Research. The Tension between Self and Other, pp. 33-50. Assen: van Gorcum .
  • Klep, C. and Van Gils, R. (1999) Van Korea tot Kosovo. Den Haag: Sdu .
  • Kramer, E. (2004) Organizing Doubt. Self-organization and Army Units in Crisis Operations. Eindhoven: TUE .
  • Kuipers, H. (1989) Zelforganisatie als ontwerpprincipe. Eindhoven: TUE .
  • Kuipers, H. and Van Amelsvoort, P. (1990) Slagvaardig Organiseren. Inleiding in de sociotechniek als integrale ontwerpleer. Deventer: Kluwer bedrijfswetenschappen .
  • McCaskey, M. B. (1982) The Executive Challenge: Managing Change and Ambiguity. Marshfield, MA: Pitman .
  • Ministerie van Defensie (1992) De prioriteiteitennota. Den Haag: Ministerie van Defensie .
  • Ministerie van Defensie (2002) CDS Leidraad I. Operationeel Concept Vredesoperaties. Den Haag: Ministerie van Defensie .
  • Morgan, G. (1997) Images of Organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
  • Peirce, C. S. (1955) Philosophical Writings of Peirce (selected and edited by J. Buchler). New York: Dover Publications, Inc.
  • Reed, M. (1999) ‘Organizational Theorizing: A Historically Contested Terrain’, in S. Clegg and C. Hardy (eds) Studying Organization, pp. 25-50. London: Sage .
  • Rescher, N. (2000) Realistic Pragmatism. An Introduction to Pragmatic Philosophy. New York: SUNY .
  • Senge, P. (1992) The Fifth Discipline. The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. London: Century Business .
  • Shank, G. (1998) ‘The Extraordinary Powers of Abductive Reasoning’ , Theory and Psychology 8(6): 841-860 .
  • Smaling, A. (2004) ‘Dubbelzinnigheid of creatieve spanning in de GT-benadering?’ , KWALON 27 9(3): 15-17 .
  • Strauss, A. (1987) Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
  • Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research. Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
  • Vogelaar, A., Bosch, J., Kuipers, H., Metselaar, M., Nederhof, F., Witteveen, A., Van den Bergh, C., De Bruin, E. and Van der Vlist, R. (1996a) Leiderschap in crisisomstandigheden. Breda : Research Paper FMB 96-32.
  • Vogelaar, A., Kramer, F., Witteveen, A., Bosch, J., Metselaar, M., Kuipers, H., Nederhof, F., Kensmil, N. and De Bruin, E. (1996b) Leiderschap in crisisomstandigheden. Deel 2. Breda : Research Paper FMB 96-36.
  • Vogelaar, A., Kramer, F., Metselaar, M., Witteveen, A., Bosch, J., Kuipers, H. and Nederhof, F. (1997) Leiderschap in crisisomstandigheden. Het functioneren van peletons-en groepscommandanten in UNPROFOR. Nijmegen: SDU .
  • Vogelaar, A. L. W., Kramer, F. J., Op den Buijs, T. P. and Peters, N. C. W. (2001) Leiderschap bij vredesoperaties. Breda : Research Paper KMA/FMB/KOC 01-59.
  • Weick, K. E. (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing. London: Sage .
  • Weick, K. E. (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations. London: Sage .
  • Wester, F. and Peters, V. (2004) Kwalitatieve Analyse. Uitgangspunten en procedures. Bussum: Coutinho .

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, E. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?