Qualitative Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, K.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Qualitative Research, Vol. 5, No. 4, 395-416 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1468794105056916

Researching online populations: the use of online focus groups for social research

Kate Stewart

Cardiff University, Stewartkf{at}cardiff.ac.uk

Matthew Williams

Cardiff University, WilliamsM7{at}cardiff.ac.uk

The survivability of ‘traditional’ methods within computer-mediated settings is dependent upon their capacity to be utilized and adapted to the technology that mediates human interaction online. This article addresses the established focus group method and evaluates its success in online applications, using as examples two quite different research projects. The first, drawn from research into the employment experiences of inflammatory bowel disease sufferers exemplifies the use of asynchronous online focus groups, identifying key practical issues such as online moderation and the analysis of digital data. In contrast the second study, into deviance within online communities, provides an example of how synchronous forms of online focus groups, held within 3D graphical environments, create further challenges for the researcher, highlighting unique ethical considerations of conducting fieldwork in cyberspace. The article draws together the authors’ experiences of applying the method to offer insights into the viability and practicability of online focus groups.

Key Words: analysing digital data • ethics • focus groups • Internet research • online research


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Criminal JusticeHome page
D. S. Wall and M. Williams
Policing diversity in the digital age: Maintaining order in virtual communities
JCriminology and Criminal Justice, November 1, 2007; 7(4): 391 - 415.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Prog Hum GeogrHome page
C. Madge
Developing a geographers' agenda for online research ethics
Progress in Human Geography, October 1, 2007; 31(5): 654 - 674.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Research in NursingHome page
F. Gibson
Conducting focus groups with children and young people: strategies for success
Journal of Research in Nursing, September 1, 2007; 12(5): 473 - 483.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qual Health ResHome page
F. E. Fox, M. Morris, and N. Rumsey
Doing Synchronous Online Focus Groups With Young People: Methodological Reflections
Qual Health Res, April 1, 2007; 17(4): 539 - 547.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qualitative ResearchHome page
M. Williams
Avatar watching: participant observation in graphical online environments
Qualitative Research, February 1, 2007; 7(1): 5 - 24.
[Abstract] [PDF]