<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com">
<title>Qualitative Research recent issues</title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com</link>
<description>Qualitative Research RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:publicationName>Qualitative Research</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1468-7941</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/8/3/275?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/283?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/293?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/307?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/317?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/325?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/333?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/339?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/347?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/355?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/367?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/379?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/389?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/399?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/411?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/423?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/435?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/2/155?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/2/179?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/2/197?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/2/217?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/2/237?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/8/2/257?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/8/2/260?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/8/2/261?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/8/2/263?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/8/2/265?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/8/2/266?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/8/2/267?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/5?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/37?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/53?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/73?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/91?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/115?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/137?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/7/4/427?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/7/4/429?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/7/4/447?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/7/4/461?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/7/4/477?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/7/4/501?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/7/4/521?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/7/4/551?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/7/4/553?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://qrj.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Qualitative Research</title>
<url>http://qrj.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/8/3/275?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Narrative methodologies: subjects, silences, re-readings and analyses]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/8/3/275?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stanley, L., Temple, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794106093622</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Narrative methodologies: subjects, silences, re-readings and analyses]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>281</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>275</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/283?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Re-imagining the narratable subject]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/283?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In this article I problematize sequence as a necessary condition for defining and making sense of narratives and argue that it is to the consideration of process that the interest in narrative research should shift. Process as an organizing plane focuses not on what stories are but on what they do and how their meaning is ceaselessly deferred, breaching the narratological conventions of coherence and closure. Drawing on my work with Gwen John's letters, I trace three methodological movements in narrative analytics: a) creating an archive of stories as multiplicities of meanings, b) following the emergence of the narratable subject, and c) making narrative connections in the political project of re-imagining the subject of feminism.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tamboukou, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794106093623</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Re-imagining the narratable subject]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>292</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>283</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/293?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Common knowledge: reflections on narratives in community]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/293?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Drawing on ethnographic and narrative research with eighth grade students from rural New Hampshire, this article explores the rich complexity of narratives built in a communal context. In close-knit rural communities, such as the one at the center of this article, personal stories may become part of a larger communal history. As such, narratives retold as communal stories highlight the relational context in which stories are crafted and underscore the ambiguity of memory, the multiplicity of truth, and the dynamics of power within a community. Here, communal stories strip individuals of the ability to craft individual narratives, as personal stories serve to create a larger communal understanding of events and history. However, for narratives of trauma in particular, as in the case at the center of this article, communal narratives may also serve as therapeutic, lightening the burden of unspeakable knowledge through the shared experience of knowing, remembering, and retelling what might otherwise remain silent. Consequently, narrative researchers must attend to the relational context in which all stories are constructed.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seaton, E. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794106094078</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Common knowledge: reflections on narratives in community]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>305</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>293</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/307?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Seeking a usable methodology: The production of the fin-de-siecle female prostitute]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/307?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The idea of a usable methodology, one which will both retain the idea of `a subject' at the heart of research and also recognize that in historical research the researcher necessarily has to work with textual remains, is discussed. Piecing this together is explored in relation to researching correspondences and other archival materials relating to two women who were fin de si&egrave;cle prostitutes and also a deaconess who helped and `rescued' them.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jansdotter, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794108093626</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Seeking a usable methodology: The production of the fin-de-siecle female prostitute]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>315</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>307</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/317?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Desire, delight, regret: discovering Elizabeth Gibson]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/317?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>My research into the life of a relative, poet and feminist Elizabeth Gibson, problematizes the boundaries and interrelationships between `academic' and `family' histories, narratives and identities. The desire for, and impossibilities of, control over the components of research and the stories that can be produced from it are discussed. The interrelated narratives of the research into Gibson, my experiences of researching my own family, and the structuring of the material into an academic paper, are analysed and combined to argue that the production and presentation of narratives is itself a form of methodology. The creative juxtaposition of narratives can generate a positive methodological anarchism that relinquishes control and challenges boundaries and hierarchies.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greenway, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794106093627</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Desire, delight, regret: discovering Elizabeth Gibson]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>324</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>317</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/325?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Narrating life stories in between the fictional and the autobiographical]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/325?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article discusses the processes of identity formation in different textual narratives, particularly in the intersections of fictional and epistolary texts, the in-between spaces where the autobiographical self becomes constituted. An important question concerns how to write about other people's lives and engage with the different textual narratives they have left behind. The Finnish writer Helmi Krohn (1871&mdash;1967) and her fictional and particularly epistolary texts offer a case study for exploring these methodological issues. In her letters to her artist colleagues, she constructs a narrative connecting her novels and her own life. I will also explore my narrative role by considering how as a historian I strive to make ethically valid analyses at the intersections of these different types of materials.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leskela-Karki, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794106093628</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Narrating life stories in between the fictional and the autobiographical]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>332</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>325</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/333?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tensions and aporias in the narrative construction of lives]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/333?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Narratives teach us how to conceive of ourselves, in two interrelated ways. The way in which we experience narrative becomes an important organizing principle for our understanding of how lives are lived; and the narratives that surround us teach us about our world and how to narrate our place within it. Narratives therefore enable us to make sense of our lives. But narrative is a paradoxical form suspended between the expected and the unexpected, which drives it forward but also constantly threatens to undermine it. This article explores the paradoxical nature of narrative and the tensions that this gives rise to in considering the narrative construction of lives.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watson, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794106093629</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tensions and aporias in the narrative construction of lives]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>337</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>333</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/339?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Plotting the lives of others: narrative structure in some recent British autobiography]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/339?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Some recent British memoirs or autobiographies are discussed, focusing on narrative structure, using theories developed by Bernstein, Ricoeur, Cavarero and others to explore the relationship between `life', `story' and the effects of emplotment. Writing the lives of others, it is argued, always has an ethical dimension, as the writer is able to take advantage of the hindsight not available to his or her subjects &mdash; here parents or grandparents. The means by which the writers concerned negotiate this privilege of hindsight, and the implications of the narrative choices they inevitably have to make, are explained.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[King, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794106093630</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Plotting the lives of others: narrative structure in some recent British autobiography]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>346</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>339</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/347?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Masculinities and narrating the past: experiences of researching white men who refused to serve in the apartheid army]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/347?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article reflexively analyses the construction of identity and the representation of the past in qualitative interviews with white men who refused to serve in the apartheid-era South African Defence Force (SADF). The contribution that white male objectors made to the anti-apartheid struggle occupies an ambivalent and increasingly forgotten aspect of South African liberation history. In a reflexive research story, I argue that the gendered, sexual and raced subjectivities of the researcher and researched are central to the joint construction of meaning in the interview and in the creation of self-narratives. The article also analyses how the narratives of white men's involvement in resisting apartheid are defined by their perceived position and wider power struggles in contemporary South Africa.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Conway, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794106093631</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Masculinities and narrating the past: experiences of researching white men who refused to serve in the apartheid army]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>354</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>347</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/355?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Narrative analysis of written texts: reflexivity in cross language research]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/355?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article examines how researchers address cross language narratives. Research and writing by migrants suggest that a change of language can lead to changes in both how people perceive themselves and how others perceive them. That is, changing language involves more than a simple change of words. However, researchers rarely consider the consequences of moving between languages in analysing and writing up narratives. This is particularly surprising for those who see narratives as contextually produced by researchers and participants and have an interest in the influence of the research process. Reflexivity is not extended to include the move across languages. I focus on some of the methodological and epistemological issues of analysing written texts produced by researchers in a language that participants did not use.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Temple, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794106093632</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Narrative analysis of written texts: reflexivity in cross language research]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>365</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>355</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/367?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Re-reading as a methodology: the case of Boer Women's testimonies]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/367?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Re-reading as a methodology is often invoked in literary and historical work, but seldom specifically delineated. The substantive focus herein concerns Boer women's testimonies of the 1899&mdash;1902 South African War, in particular testimonies of the British military scorched earth policy of forced removals and concentration camps. The methodology of re-reading such texts against each other is explored so as to `re-read the record' of the Mafeking concentration camp, using a set of unpublished testimonies. Re-reading reveals tensions and disjunctures in these testimonies, and highlights the pervasiveness of established, rehearsed narrative structures which characterize in effect all women's testimonies of the concentration camps of the South African War. The processes of re-reading are examined as a methodology which interrogates a particular text's context of production, and, crucially, the context of reading and the ways in which this shapes readerly responses to the text.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dampier, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794106093633</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Re-reading as a methodology: the case of Boer Women's testimonies]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>377</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>367</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/379?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Analysing narratives as practices]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/379?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Departing from a critique of the conventional paradigm of narrative analysis, inspired by Labov and the narrative turn in social sciences, we propose an alternative framework, recommending combining a focus on the local occasioning of narratives in interaction with the analysis of their participation in a variety of macro-processes, through mobilizing the notions of social practice, genre and community of practice.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[De Fina, A., Georgakopoulou, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794106093634</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Analysing narratives as practices]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>387</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>379</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/389?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Analysing men's written friendship narratives]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/389?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>People make sense of their lives through their narratives, which provide a set of culturally shared plots that give their lives meaning and represent belonging. A range of personal and cultural experiences is made available through analysing these narratives. Here, analysis of men's personal narratives is considered as a valuable means by which the culture of men's friendship can be explored and defined. We present a method for generating narratives, where respondents were asked in an online survey to describe a deep connection or fall-out with a friend. One of these written narratives is analysed here by adapting Labov's framework for analysing narrative in conversation and supplementing it with insights from discursive work.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy, L., Montague, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794106093635</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Analysing men's written friendship narratives]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>397</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>389</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/399?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What can be known and how? Narrated subjects and the Listening Guide]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/399?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article grapples with the question of `<I>what</I> can be known?' about research subjects and <I>how</I> we can come to know them. Set against a backdrop of theoretical tensions over the concept of subjectivity in feminist theory, our article makes a three-fold argument. First, we argue that theoretical impasses between critical and constructed subjects can be addressed through the evolving concept of a <I>narrated subject</I>. Second, we suggest that this concept needs to be further interrogated by asking what can be known about narrated subjects both <I>inside</I> and <I>outside</I> of narrative. Third, we argue that greater attention must be given to <I>how</I> narrated subjects can be operationalized within research methodology, and we suggest that an emerging interpretive approach, the Listening Guide, provides a multi-layered way of tapping into methodological, theoretical, epistemological, and ontological dimensions of the narrated subject.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doucet, A., Mauthner, N. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794106093636</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What can be known and how? Narrated subjects and the Listening Guide]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>409</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>399</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/411?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The narrative potential of the British Birth Cohort Studies]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/411?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This paper draws attention to the narrative potential of longitudinal studies such as the British Birth Cohort Studies (BBCS), and explores the possibility of creating narrative case histories and conducting narrative analysis based on information available from the studies. The BBCS have historically adopted a quantitative research design and used structured interviews and questionnaires to collect data from large samples of individuals born in specific years. However, the longitudinal nature of these studies means that they follow the same sample of individuals from birth through childhood into adult life, and this leads to the creation of data that can be understood as a quantitative auto/biography.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elliott, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794106093637</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The narrative potential of the British Birth Cohort Studies]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>421</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>411</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/423?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cancer narratives and methodological uncertainties]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/423?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article considers the methodological uncertainties arising in the early months of a research project that involves the secondary data analysis, using narrative analysis methods, of lengthy interview transcripts with cancer patients and their main informal carers. It revisits the particular social contexts, purposes and intentions involved in the creation of the interview transcripts, then considers the new methodological challenges involved. A sociological preference for the analysis of narrative <I>content</I> rather than narrative <I>form</I> is examined, before being set aside in favour of exploring both content and form in broader social context.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794106093638</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cancer narratives and methodological uncertainties]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>433</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>423</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/435?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Madness to the method? Using a narrative methodology to analyse large-scale complex social phenomena]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/3/435?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Building on earlier research, two related narrative inquiry projects were conducted, concerned with Boer (later, Afrikaner) women's testimonies of their wartime and concentration camp experiences, and with commemoration of the people who died in these camps. Putting the design into practice, and the advantages and disadvantages of the approach, are both discussed. Overall, using a narrative inquiry approach for investigating large-scale complex social phenomena, in this case connected with the rise of proto-nationalism in South Africa and women's role in it, was methodologically and analytically problematic although interesting and instructive.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stanley, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794106093639</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Madness to the method? Using a narrative methodology to analyse large-scale complex social phenomena]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>447</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>435</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/2/155?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Persona non grata: dilemmas of being an outsider researching immigration         reform activism]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/2/155?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Sociologists may encounter myriad obstacles in the research process that affect the                 research design and outcomes. There is, for example, a certain measure of resistance                 and hostility experienced in sociological research on distasteful social movements                 that is seldom acknowledged or included in published findings. The present analysis                 explores the emotional conflicts between the research program and the 'gatekeeping'                 activities of research respondents and the professional academic community in the                 USA. Politically sensitive, even volatile subjects such as the US immigration reform                 movement may rest on the classic affective/cognitive dichotomy found in sociology. I                 suggest that moralistic or politically positioned emotional resistance complicated                 the research process in two ways: 1) academic associates and mentors likened                 involvement with the immigration reform movement to scholarly complicity that                 marginalized the study's validity; and, 2) activists were inherently distrustful of                 the research and its goals given what they claimed to be a history of                 misinterpretation and scholarly 'bad press.'</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Armitage, J. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794107087478</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Persona non grata: dilemmas of being an outsider researching immigration         reform activism]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>177</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>155</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/2/179?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cross-cultural researching: Maori and Pakeha         in Te Whakapakari]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/2/179?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This paper focuses on evolving Maori centred qualitative research methods,                 and the cross-cultural relationship between two researchers who identify                 respectively as Maori and Pakeha New Zealanders.                 The researchers discuss methodology issues which surrounded the school based Te                 Whakapakari research project. The project's aim was to raise the academic                 achievement of Maori (indigenous New Zealanders) mainstreamed children. The writers                 discuss their theoretical and personal backgrounds, and the accommodations they each                 made to meet the goals of the project. The writers argue that the face-to-face                 aspects (<I>he kanohi kitea</I>) of the project were integral to the project's                 success. The qualitative research based project included action research, and                 Maori-based professional development. A Freirean approach was integral to                 professional development. The writers worked alongside six teachers and school                 leaders.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carpenter, V. M., McMurchy-Pilkington, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794107087480</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cross-cultural researching: Maori and Pakeha         in Te Whakapakari]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>196</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>179</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/2/197?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Fieldnotes in team ethnography: researching complementary schools]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/2/197?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Ethnography has typically been seen as a singular research journey in which the lone                 researcher engages in the study of a community. However, increasingly within the                 social sciences, ethnographic research takes place in teams. This article explores                 the processes of using fieldnotes to develop team ethnography in a study of Gujarati                 complementary schools in a diverse English city. Complementary schools are also                 known as supplementary, heritage and community language schools. They are voluntary,                 usually run by local communities, and outside the state education sector. The                 article looks at how fieldnotes are used by researchers to constitute a team,                 contest interpretations and produce nuanced accounts of complementary schools. For                 the purpose of this article, a set of fieldnotes has been selected and presented as                 a case study to illustrate the role fieldnotes played in the team. The article                 explores their iterative use by the four-member team to settle upon particular                 research themes. We consider the role fieldnotes played in the team's reaching                 contested but shared accounts of social and linguistic action in one particular                 complementary school.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Creese, A., Bhatt, A., Bhojani, N., Martin, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794107087481</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Fieldnotes in team ethnography: researching complementary schools]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>215</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>197</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/2/217?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Positivity in qualitative research: examples from the organized field of postmodernism/poststructuralism]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/2/217?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article emphasizes the essential role of positivity, an organized field of knowledge, in qualitative research and how positivity enables and limits qualitative data, design, and research process. First, I describe some possible objects and subjects of knowing in qualitative research and discuss potential conditions of postmodernist/poststructuralist qualitative research. I then illustrate how different systems (such as language and power) within the organized field of postmodernism/poststructuralism regulate approaches to qualitative research and possible methodological functions available to researchers. Throughout the article, I make reference to my own research process focusing on the studies of academic achievement and 'scientific giftedness' to produce an article that blends subjective, empirical, and theoretical ways of knowing.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Koro-Ljungberg, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794107087482</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Positivity in qualitative research: examples from the organized field of postmodernism/poststructuralism]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>236</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>217</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/2/237?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Motives and social organization: sociological amnesia, psychological description and the analysis of accounts]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/2/237?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>During the course of this article we explore the sociological tradition of analysing motives and accounts. In doing so we contrast this with more recent methodological developments that have analysed similar phenomena as part of a strategy of respecifying psychological theories of cognition. Through the use of analytic examples we demonstrate how accounts and the invocation of 'inner' or 'underlying' states must be understood not only in terms of situated action but also in terms of the situated accomplishment of social organization. In this way the theoretical amnesia enveloping the analysis of accounts and motives can be confronted and their status <I>as</I> empirical sociological phenomena sustained within future avenues of qualitative research.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Housley, W., Fitzgerald, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794107087483</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Motives and social organization: sociological amnesia, psychological description and the analysis of accounts]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>256</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>237</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/8/2/257?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book review: CALVIN MORRILL, DAVID A. SNOW, and CINDY H. WHITE (eds.), Together Alone: Personal Relationships in Public Places. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2005, 320 pp. ISBN 0 520 24522 9 (hbk) $50.00, {pound}32.50; ISBN 0 520 24522 7 (pb) $19.95, {pound}12.95]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/8/2/257?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Borer, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794107087484</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book review: CALVIN MORRILL, DAVID A. SNOW, and CINDY H. WHITE (eds.), Together Alone: Personal Relationships in Public Places. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2005, 320 pp. ISBN 0 520 24522 9 (hbk) $50.00, {pound}32.50; ISBN 0 520 24522 7 (pb) $19.95, {pound}12.95]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>259</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>257</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/8/2/260?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book review: PALOMA GAY Y BLASCO and HUON WARDLE, How to Read Ethnography. London: Routledge, 2007, 214 pp. (index included). ISBN 0 415 32866 7 (hbk) {pound}60.00, 0 415 32867 5 (pbk), {pound}18.99, 0 203 39096 2 (ebk)]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/8/2/260?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Atkinson, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/14687941080080020602</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book review: PALOMA GAY Y BLASCO and HUON WARDLE, How to Read Ethnography. London: Routledge, 2007, 214 pp. (index included). ISBN 0 415 32866 7 (hbk) {pound}60.00, 0 415 32867 5 (pbk), {pound}18.99, 0 203 39096 2 (ebk)]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>261</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>260</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/8/2/261?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book review: THOMAS L. CHARLTON, LOIS E. MYERS and REBECCA SHARPLESS (eds.),         Handbook of Oral History. Oxford: Altamira Press, 2006, 625 pp. ISBN 0 759 102 295         (hbk) {pound}90.50]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/8/2/261?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hurdley, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/14687941080080020603</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book review: THOMAS L. CHARLTON, LOIS E. MYERS and REBECCA SHARPLESS (eds.),         Handbook of Oral History. Oxford: Altamira Press, 2006, 625 pp. ISBN 0 759 102 295         (hbk) {pound}90.50]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>263</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>261</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/8/2/263?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book review: GILLIAN ROSE, Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the         Interpretation of Visual Materials (Second edition) London: SAGE, 2007, 287 pp.         ISBN: 978 1 4129 2190 9 (hbk) {pound}70.00, 978 1 4129 2191 6 (pbk)         {pound}21.99]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/8/2/263?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hurdley, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/14687941080080020604</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book review: GILLIAN ROSE, Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the         Interpretation of Visual Materials (Second edition) London: SAGE, 2007, 287 pp.         ISBN: 978 1 4129 2190 9 (hbk) {pound}70.00, 978 1 4129 2191 6 (pbk)         {pound}21.99]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>264</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>263</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/8/2/265?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book review: JOHANNA MOISANDER and ANU VALTONEN, Qualitative Marketing         Research: A Cultural Approach. London: SAGE, 2006, 227 pp (including index). ISBN: 1         41290380 7 (hbk): {pound}77.00, 1 41290381 5 (pbk): {pound}24.99]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/8/2/265?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smallbone, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/14687941080080020605</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book review: JOHANNA MOISANDER and ANU VALTONEN, Qualitative Marketing         Research: A Cultural Approach. London: SAGE, 2006, 227 pp (including index). ISBN: 1         41290380 7 (hbk): {pound}77.00, 1 41290381 5 (pbk): {pound}24.99]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>266</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>265</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/8/2/266?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book review: LARRY T. REYNOLDS and NANCY J. HERMAN--KINNEY,         Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism. Walnut Tree, CA: Altamira Press, 2003, 1077 pp.         ISBN 0 7591 0092 6. $110.00]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/8/2/266?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Housley, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/14687941080080020606</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book review: LARRY T. REYNOLDS and NANCY J. HERMAN--KINNEY,         Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism. Walnut Tree, CA: Altamira Press, 2003, 1077 pp.         ISBN 0 7591 0092 6. $110.00]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>267</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>266</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/8/2/267?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book review: SARAH PINK, Doing Visual Ethnography: Images, Media and         Representation in Research (Second edition). London, Thousand Oaks, New Dehli: SAGE,         2006, 224 pp. ISBN 10 1 4129 2348 4 (pbk) {pound}21.99]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/8/2/267?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prosser, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/14687941080080020607</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book review: SARAH PINK, Doing Visual Ethnography: Images, Media and         Representation in Research (Second edition). London, Thousand Oaks, New Dehli: SAGE,         2006, 224 pp. ISBN 10 1 4129 2348 4 (pbk) {pound}21.99]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>270</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>267</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/5?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Contrasting perspectives on narrating selves and identities: an invitation to dialogue]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/5?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In recent years, qualitative researchers have in varied ways conceptualized selves and identities as narratively constructed. In this article, we offer a typology for viewing, the various conceptualizations of narrative identities and selves. Five perspectives are presented for discussion. These are, the psychosocial, the inter-subjective, the storied resource, the dialogic and the performative perspectives. Insights into contrasts between them are also generated by exploring the emphasis given by each perspective to both the social and individual in creating selves and identities. These contrasts are organized along a continuum, with perspectives that adopt a `thick individual' and `thin social relational' view to the self and identity at one end, and those that adopt a `thin individual' and `thick social relational' view at the other. We close by suggesting that each perspective is worthy of consideration in its own right and that coexistence is possible despite their differences.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smith, B., Sparkes, A. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794107085221</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Contrasting perspectives on narrating selves and identities: an invitation to dialogue]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>35</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/37?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Power and pleasure in ethnographic home-work: producing a recognizable ethics]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/37?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The author uses Michel Foucault's power/knowledge/pleasure combination to analyze the production of ethical practices in qualitative research. Through two data stories, the author recounts her own pleasurable acts while carrying out an ethnographic study in her hometown high school. The pleasures of conducting such home-work are analyzed to point out the ethics of constituting the experience of the self in qualitative research.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Youngblood Jackson, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794107085294</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Power and pleasure in ethnographic home-work: producing a recognizable ethics]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>51</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>37</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/53?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Educational ethnography as performance art: towards a sensuous feeling and knowing]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/53?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The article methodologically positions and subsequently describes an ethnographic-based performance art piece staged as the author's keynote address at the UK's first international conference on Arts-Based Educational Research held at Queen's University Belfast. The article draws on existing arts-based research literature and a range of participant `voices' &mdash; including the voice of the author as `impresario' whose research provided the ethnographic data and facilitated the performance, the voices of the artists as `performers' who created and staged the piece, and the voices of the audience as `spec-actors' who made the journey through the performance &mdash; to make its case and hopefully encourage other qualitative researchers to a performative (re)presentational embrace.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bagley, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794107085296</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Educational ethnography as performance art: towards a sensuous feeling and knowing]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>72</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>53</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/73?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Focus groups and the study of violence]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/73?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The article examines the focus group method as a tool to study violence in youth residential care based on an empirical study of 38 young people in two Finnish reform schools. The key issue here is to reflect upon the processes of knowledge production as we trace the ways in which the institutional and situational context and the very form of focus groups affect the ways of talking about violence. Special attention is given to strong and weak themes in the focus group interviews.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Poso, T., Honkatukia, P., Nyqvist, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794107085297</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Focus groups and the study of violence]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>89</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>73</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/91?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[`Entering the blogosphere': some strategies for using blogs in social research]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/91?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Since 1999 blogs have become a significant feature of online culture. They have been heralded as the new guardians of democracy, a revolutionary form of bottom-up news production and a new way of constructing self and doing community in late-modern times. In this article I highlight the significance of the `blogosphere' as a new addition to the qualitative researcher's toolkit and some of the practical, theoretical and methodological issues that arise from this. Some of the key ethical issues involved in blog data collection are also considered. The research context is a project on everyday understandings and experiences of morality.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hookway, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794107085298</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[`Entering the blogosphere': some strategies for using blogs in social research]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>113</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>91</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/115?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The tip of the iceberg: working on the Victoria Climbie Data Corpus Project]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/115?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In this article I provide an overview of the methodological approaches of the Victoria Climbi&eacute; Data Corpus Project, which aims to provide researchers, educators and policy makers with an invaluable source of data, based upon the coding of witness statements given to the Victoria Climbi&eacute; Inquiry. I assess my own research role within this, making a case for the need to incorporate more grounded theory techniques, research reflexivity and subjective interpretation, alongside the `objective' coding frame being used, derived from a Delphi exercise. I include witness testimonies to highlight the kind of issues that lay beyond the codes and which cannot be effectively grasped by them. In using the specific example of the Climbi&eacute; case, I argue that research surrounding emotive issues must be qualitatively sensitive to the social and discursive nuances present in the data, as opposed to solely relying upon objective a priori codes.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794107085299</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The tip of the iceberg: working on the Victoria Climbie Data Corpus Project]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>135</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>115</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/137?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/137?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><I>Saturation</I> is mentioned in many qualitative research reports without any explanation of what it means and how it occurred. Recognizing the saturation point presents a challenge to qualitative researchers, especially in the absence of explicit guidelines for determining data or theoretical saturation. This research note examines the saturation concept in naturalistic inquiry and the challenges it presents. In particular, it summarizes the saturation process in a grounded theory study of community-based antipoverty projects. The main argument advanced in this research note is that claims of saturation should be supported by an explanation of how saturation was achieved and substantiated by clear evidence of its occurrence.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bowen, G. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794107085301</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>152</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>137</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/7/4/427?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Editorial]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/7/4/427?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Delamont, S., Atkinson, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-10-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794107084937</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Editorial]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>428</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>427</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/7/4/429?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The process of sample recruitment: an ethnostatistical perspective]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/7/4/429?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article draws on the authors' fieldwork experiences in four different research studies to address the gap in the methodological literature on the practical activities of sample recruitment. Boundaries between ineligibility and refusal are considered along with the `emotional labour' required during the recruitment process. In particular, the article aims to draw attention to the necessary indeterminacies in the recruitment process to show how the practical reasoning and situated action of researchers in the field critically determine the constitution of the study sample and the recruitment rate. It is concluded that, while no rules can adequately specify the process of recruitment, more resources, particularly to allow team recruitment, would reduce researcher stress and allow greater quality control.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas, M., Bloor, M., Frankland, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-10-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794107082300</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The process of sample recruitment: an ethnostatistical perspective]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>446</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>429</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/7/4/447?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reflexive accounts about qualitative interviewing within the context of educational policy in North Cyprus]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/7/4/447?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Located within policy studies and politics of education in North Cyprus, this article is a medium through which methodological quandaries about reflexive accounts of qualitative interviewing arise in a dialogic fashion within the arena of education reform. Relying primarily on field notes, it explores the two-way management and negotiation of identity work, its effects on data gathering, and the public and private sides of interviewing. The researcher, present author, argues through numerous examples that both interviewees and the interviewer are actively engaged in identity crafting. These co-constructed identities influence the data-gathering process and the emerging intersubjective narratives of lived experiences in social worlds. She also makes a case that reflexive accounts of identity work are intersubjective, co-constructed identities are not genuinely knowable and the identity work is not genuinely comprehensible.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mertkan-Ozunlu, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-10-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794107082301</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reflexive accounts about qualitative interviewing within the context of educational policy in North Cyprus]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>459</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>447</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/7/4/461?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pivoting the centre: reflections on undertaking qualitative interviewing in academia]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/7/4/461?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Researchers studying the role of universities in economic development have paid                 little attention to methods issues relating to the influence of researcher                 identities in interviews. Yet in this field of work, researcher identities can have                 a significant influence on the validity and reliability of `data' and their                 interpretation, not least because the researchers and at least some of their                 interviewees, ostensibly, are from the same sector and perhaps even are known to                 each other. This article considers the influences on the data of multiple identities                 occupied by an early career researcher doing qualitative interviews for a doctoral                 project on the role of universities in regional development. The identities occupied                 by the author were novice researcher, academic insider, career changer and former                 public sector executive who was a client of university academics. The article                 demonstrates the potential impact of these identities on the data collected and                 their interpretation, and the researcher's attempts to negotiate these identities.                 In thus demonstrating that the `how' of data collection can have important effects                 on the `what' of data collection and interpretation, the article argues that                 qualitative interviews in higher education policy research should pay more attention                 to the social construction of interview `data'.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gunasekara, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-10-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794107082302</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pivoting the centre: reflections on undertaking qualitative interviewing in academia]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>475</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>461</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/7/4/477?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ethnic-matching in qualitative research: reversing the gaze on `white others' and `white' as `other']]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/7/4/477?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Writings on inter-racial/ethnic research tend to posit `nonwhite' as the researched `other'. There is scant literature dealing with `others' within whiteness or treating whiteness itself as an `other'. This article draws on the experience of a project looking at the quality of life of older people in Britain to illuminate often implicit assumptions underpinning the practice of ethnic-matching in qualitative research by reversing the research gaze. By examining the procedures involved in matching majority and minority ethnic researchers to a range of `white' respondents, this article unveils the often unscrutinized values and assumptions of certain sets of practice in qualitative research that can influence the process and products of research. Reversing the `ethnic' research gaze can help to illuminate new perspectives on the construction of otherness and positionalities within research. While this article looks at the influence of ethnicity on the research process, it acknowledges that ethnicity may not always be the primary social signifier and may also intersect with a range of other identifiers such as age, gender, class and geography.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hoong Sin, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-10-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794107082304</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ethnic-matching in qualitative research: reversing the gaze on `white others' and `white' as `other']]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>499</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>477</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/7/4/501?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Negotiating the politics of identity in an interdisciplinary research team]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/7/4/501?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article explores the politics of identity in an interdisciplinary health                 research team that has been engaged in a qualitative research program for over five                 years. We draw on sociological theories of power and knowledge to explore our                 experiences of identity conflict, team socialization, and knowledge production.                 Structurally, our article integrates individual and group perspectives through                 personal narratives and collaborative critique as we explore the complex                 negotiations required to realize and maintain our team dynamic. These negotiations                 take place not only with one another as particularly positioned individuals, but                 also with the ideological and organizational forces that structure our scholarly                 worlds. We conclude with articulating `lessons learned' that we hope will enable                 other interdisciplinary research teams to realize the rich potential of their                 collaborative qualitative work.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lingard, L., Schryer, C. F., Spafford, M. M., Campbell, S. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-10-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794107082305</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Negotiating the politics of identity in an interdisciplinary research team]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>519</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>501</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/7/4/521?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Embodiment, academics, and the audit culture: a story seeking consideration]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/7/4/521?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In response to the plea by Pelias (2004) for a <I>methodology of the heart,</I>                 this article presents a story about the embodied struggles of an academic at a                 university that is permeated by an audit culture. It is based on informal interviews                 with academics at various universities in England and selected personal experiences.                 Thus, the constructive process is inspired by partial happenings, fragmented                 memories, echoes of conversations, whispers in corridors, fleeting glimpses of                 myriad reflections seen through broken glass, and multiple layers of fiction and                 narrative imaginings. Methodological issues abound in the telling and showing but,                 quite rightly, remain dormant on this occasion. In the end, the story simply asks                 for your consideration.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sparkes, A. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-10-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794107082306</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Embodiment, academics, and the audit culture: a story seeking consideration]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>550</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>521</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/7/4/551?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book review: GEOFFREY WALFORD (Ed), Investigating Educational Policy Through Ethnography: Studies in Educational Ethnography Volume 8. Oxford: JAI Press, 2003, vi+255 pp. ISBN 0 7623 1018 9 (hbk) {pound}60]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/7/4/551?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ivinson, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-10-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1468794107084945</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book review: GEOFFREY WALFORD (Ed), Investigating Educational Policy Through Ethnography: Studies in Educational Ethnography Volume 8. Oxford: JAI Press, 2003, vi+255 pp. ISBN 0 7623 1018 9 (hbk) {pound}60]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>553</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>551</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/7/4/553?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Book review: CATHY CHARMAZ, Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage, 2006. 208 pp. (including index). ISBN 0 7619 73524 (hbk) {pound}65.00; ISBN 0 7619 7353 2 (pbk) {pound}19.99]]></title>
<link>http://qrj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/7/4/553?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smit, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-10-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/14687941070070040802</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Book review: CATHY CHARMAZ, Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage, 2006. 208 pp. (including index). ISBN 0 7619 73524 (hbk) {pound}65.00; ISBN 0 7619 7353 2 (pbk) {pound}19.99]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>555</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>553</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>